Landscape of Friendliness of Country Communication Regimes on Post-Soviet Space: 2022 Monitoring Results

The author presents the monitoring results of friendliness of communication regimes of neighboring countries. It is pointed out that communication regime concept has a significant gnoseological, predictive and interpretative potential for analysis of internal political processes and external policy strategy of the countries. Monitoring of amicable attitude of communication regimes considers research of practices, conditions, regulations imposed in a particular country in context of communication with Russia. Governmental and Non-governmental actors are assessed – as well as political and civil communications are observed. In 2022, intensification of polarity between friendly and unfriendly countries has been noted. Unfriendly counties have established a model of total prohibition of communication with Russia. Political pressure on religious and civil society institutions has increased. Friendly and partially friendly countries, meanwhile, have improved conditions for economic, educational and scientific communications.

1. Begalinova, K.K., Gribin, N.P., Komleva, V.V., Kotukova, T.V., Nazarov, R.R., Ospanova, A.N., Panov, V.S., Smolik, N.G., Turgunbayeva, A., Cheremenina, E.G. (2021), Communication regimes in Central Asian countries: a scientific discussion. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 1(2). pp. 96-137. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2021-1-2-96-137 (In Russian).

2. Volkov, V.V., Vorotnikov, V.V., Komleva, V.V., Starikov, A.D. (2021), Communication regimes of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia: scientific discussion. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 1(2). pp.138-161. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2021-1-2-138-161 (In Russian).

3. Gasumyanov, V.I., Komleva, V.V. (2021), Friendliness of country communication regimes: interpretation and assessment. International Affairs. 2021. No. 8. pp. 68-77. (In Russian).

4. Gasumyanov, V.I., Komleva, V.V. (2020), Communication Regimes as a Factor of Interstate Interactions: Problem Statement. International Affairs. No. 10, pp. 38-49. (In Russian).

5. Gribin, N.P. (2021), Communication regimes of the Central Asian states in the context of the national security interests of the Russian Federation. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 1(2). pp. 80-95. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2021-1-2-80-95 (In Russian).

6. Gribin, N.P., Kohtyulina, I.N., Sedunov, D.I., Sobolev, E.I. (2022), Information sovereignity: materials of scientific discussion. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 2(4). pp. 100-131. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-2(4)-100-131 (In Russian).

7. Zvonova, М.Е. (2021), Friendliness of country communication regimes on the example of Russian-Estonian relations. Obozrevatel’-Observer. 2021. No. 10(381). pp. 40-53. https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2021_10_40 (In Russian).

8. Komleva, V.V. (2021), International NGOs in Central Asia countries. Obozrevatel’ – Observer. No. 12. pp. 5-12. https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2021_12_5 (In Russian).

9. Komleva, V.V. (2022), Methodology for Analyzing the Manageability of Country Communication Modes. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 3(5). pp. 94-107. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-3(5)-94-107 (In Russian).

10. Komleva, V.V. (2021), Securitization of national identity in communication regimes of states in Central Asia. International Affairs. No. 12. pp. 66-74. (In Russian).

11. Komleva, V.V. (2021), Country Communication Regime as a Socio-Political Phenomenon. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 1(1). pp. 13-26. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2021-1-1-13-26 (In Russian).

12. Komleva, V.V. (2022), The Manageability of Country Communication Regimes. Communicology. No.10(1). pp. 139-154. https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-1-139-154 (In Russian).

13. Komleva, V.V., Aseykin, М.М. (2021), Regional communication regime: the actor model of the Republic of Tatarstan. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. No. 6(134). pp. 50-57. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2021-23-6-50-57 (In Russian).

14. Komleva, V.V., Barakhvostov, P.A., Kalacheva, I.I., Mezhevich, N.M., Rogalsky, S.G., Vorotnikov, V.V., Kachura, A.G., Lazorkina, O.I., Stoppe, A.G. (2022), The communication mode of Belarus: stability and formation factors. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 2(4). pp. 132-163. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-2(4)-132-163 (In Russian).

15. Komleva, V.V., Sheveleva, Y.R. (2022), Rating of amicable attitude of the countries communicative regimes 2021. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 1(3). pp. 216-223. (In Russian).

16. Leger, I. (2022), Communication Regime of the Republic of Moldova: Assessment of Manageability. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 4(6). pp. 86-109. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-4(6)-86-109 (In Russian).

17. Tatarov, R.A. (2022), Friendly communication modes of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Moldova in the realities of fragmentation of the world communication order. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 2(4). pp.63-75. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-2(4)-63-75 (In Russian).

18. Tikhonov, Y.P. (2022), Formation of Dependent Communication Regime of Ukraine: United States Impact. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 3(5). pp. 108-119. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-3(5)-108-119 (In Russian).

19. Shabrov, O.F., Komleva, V.V., Volodenkov, S.V., Gadzhiev, K.A., Guliyev, I.A. (2022), State sustainability and stability in the digital age: discussion materials. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. No. 2(4). pp. 204-223. https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2022-2-2(4)-204-223 (In Russian).