Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
https://doi.org/10.56654/ROPI-2022-4(4)-102-115
Abstract
The strengthening of Germany's position after 1990 allowed it to expand its geopolitical ambitions in regions previously little included in the foreign policy agenda of Germany. One of these regions has become the Arctic, the development and study of which takes place through participation in international Arctic organizations, as well as through bilateral agreements with Arctic states. However, at the end of the twentieth century, until 2013, Germany's Arctic position can be characterized as unambitious and passive, due to the lack of funding for German delegations to participate in Arctic Council working groups, insufficient coordination policy between federal ministries and agencies whose areas include the development and implementation of Arctic policy, as well as the lack of common interest in the implementation of national priorities in the region through the structures of the Arctic Council. Germany participates in the development of projects mainly related to ecology. This position creates a favorable image of Germany as the patron saint of the Arctic, which does not detract from the scientific value of German climate and environmental research. For the Arctic policy of Germany, it is also characteristic to involve broad segments of society in scientific research, thereby instilling the idea of a stable German presence in the Arctic.
About the Author
E. A. KuzmenkoRussian Federation
Elena A. Kuzmenko - CandSc (Hist.), Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Regional Studies and International Cooperation of the Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, Member of the Russian Society for Intellectual History SPIN-код: 3078-1553. AuthorID: 773498.
Moscow
References
1. Aliev, R. (2016), The wrong side of white. The Arctic from Vikings to Papanins. Moscow : «Paulsen». (In Russian)
2. Belov, V.B. (2015), German interests and German-Russian cooperation in the Arctic. Contemporary Europe. No 3. pp. 43-48. (In Russian)
3. Vize, V.Yu. (1948), Seas of the Soviet Arctic. Essays on the history of research. Мoscow ; Leningrad. (In Russian)
4. Gavrilov, O.Yu. (2019), The state and prospects of development of the regional security system in the Arctic. Military Thought. No. 6. pp. 34-49. (In Russian)
5. Deryugin, К.К. (1968), Soviet oceanographic expeditions. Leningrad. (In Russian)
6. Zhuravel, V.P (2020), The Arctic in 2019: international and national aspects (issues of international cooperation and security). Arctic and North. No. 38. pp. 105-122. (In Russian)
7. Kotov, A.V. (2021), The Arctic vector of German foreign policy. Scientific and Analytical Herald of Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences. No. 2. pp. 48-54. (In Russian)
8. Lukin, Y. F. (2019), The Diverse Arctic in the flow of time and meanings. Arkhangelsk. (In Russian)
9. Magidovich, I.P, Magidovich, V.I. (1967), Essays on the history of geographical discoveries. Moscow. (In Russian)
10. Podoplekin, А.О. (2013), Research structures for ensuring the Arctic policy of foreign states. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Humanitarian and Social Sciences series. No. 6. pp. 50-62. (In Russian)
11. Serikova, U.S. (2016), History of Arctic exploration. History and pedagogy of natural science. No. 4. pp. 35-40. (In Russian)
12. Haftendorn, H. (2011), NATO and the Arctic: Is the Atlantic Alliance a Cold War Relic in a Peaceful Region now Faced with Non-Military Challenges? European Security. No. 20 (3). pp. 337-361.
13. Keil, K., Knecht, S. (2017), Governing Arctic Change: Global Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Knecht, S. (2017) The politics of Arctic international cooperation: Introducing a dataset on stakeholder participation in Arctic Council meetings, 1998-2015. Cooperation and Conflict. Vol. 52(2). pp. 203-223.
Review
For citations:
Kuzmenko E.A. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA). Russia: Society, Politics, History. 2022;(4(4)):102-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56654/ROPI-2022-4(4)-102-115