Preview

Russia: Society, Politics, History

Advanced search

Arctic Agenda of the European Union: Problems and Prospects

https://doi.org/10.56654/ROPI-2022-4(4)-84-101

Abstract

The European Union (EU) “realized” its Arctic interests mainly due to the entry of Denmark, and then Finland and Sweden, which forced Brussels to start developing special programs for the development of the northern and subarctic territories. Over time, the Arctic has become an increasingly important object of attention for scientists, ecologists, power engineers, the military, including those from the EU countries. It was gradually opened up as a military-strategic region, influencing the global climate, forming new logistical sea routes, and as a storehouse of resources. Given the ever-growing interest in the Arctic of the socalled non-Arctic players, primarily China, the EU is also striving to define its position in the region. Its ability to cooperate with other actors, including the Arctic Council, is limited by many factors and circumstances. Nevertheless, Brussels is clearly following the agenda of increasing its presence in the Arctic. However, given the current de facto ignorance by the Arctic Council countries of the largest Arctic state represented by Russia, the still cautious attitude towards the EU on the part of other Council members may be changed. The purpose of the article is to identify the most significant factors that determine the possibility of strengthening the EU’s position in the Arctic, as well as the circumstances that impede this strategy. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve the following tasks: to analyze the main aspects of the EU Arctic strategy; identify opportunities for EU interaction with Arctic institutions; indicate the influence of the Russian factor on the Arctic prospects of the EU.

About the Author

N. V. Eremina
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Eremina - DSc (Polit.), CandSc (Hist.), professor.

Ul. Universitetskaya naberezhnaya, 7–9, Saint Petersburg, 199034



References

1. Eremina, N.V. (2019), European Union Arctic policy: tasks and problems. Ojkumena. Regional researches. No. 4. pp. 30–39. DOI: 10.24866/19986785/2019-4/30-39 (In Russian)

2. Tulupov, D.S., Tsarenko, E. V. (2019), Podkhod Yevropeyskogo soyuza k politike v arkticheskom napravlenii i yego sootnosheniye s regionalʹnymi interesami RF [European Union’s approach to the Arctic policy development through the lens of the Russian regional interests]. Arctic and North. No. 37. pp. 82–93. (In Russian)

3. Archer, C., Etzold, T. (2008), The EU’s northern dimension: Blurring frontiers between Russia and the EU North? NORDEUROPAforum. No. 1. pp. 7–28.

4. Dodds, K. (2013), Anticipating the Arctic and the Arctic Council: Pre-emption, precaution and preparedness. Polar Record. 2013. Vol. 49(2). pp. 193-203. DOI: 10.1017/S0032247412000198

5. Eremina, N. (2021), UK-Russia relations in the Arctic: from damage limitation to a cooperative agenda? The Polar Journal. Vol. 11:1. pp. 57-74. DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2021.1932275

6. Heininen, L. (2017), The Arctic, Baltic, and North-Atlantic “cooperative regions” in “Wider Northern Europe”: Similarities and differences. Journal of Baltic Studies. Vol. 48(4). pp. 435–450.

7. Koivurova, T. (2010), Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance. Polar Record. 2010. Vol. 46(2). pp. 146156. DOI: 10.1017/S0032247409008365

8. Lagutina, M., Leksyutina, Y. (2019), BRICS countries’ strategies in the Arctic and the prospects for consolidated BRICS agenda in the Arctic. The Polar Journal. Vol. 9:1. pp. 45-63. DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2019.1618559

9. Smieszek, M. (2019), Do the cures match the problem? Reforming the Arctic Council. Polar Record. Vol. 55(3). pp. 121-131. DOI: 10.1017/S0032247419000263


Review

For citations:


Eremina N.V. Arctic Agenda of the European Union: Problems and Prospects. Russia: Society, Politics, History. 2022;(4(4)):84-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56654/ROPI-2022-4(4)-84-101

Views: 656


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-1142 (Print)
ISSN 2782-621X (Online)