Интересы Индии в российской Арктике
Аннотация
В статье рассматриваются основные интересы Индии, связанные с участием в арктических проектах и сотрудничеством с Россией. На основе анализа арктической политики Индии, принципы и направления которой сформулированы в арктической стратегии Индии 2022 года, автор выделяет группы критически значимых проблем, решение которых Индия связывает с российско-индийским сотрудничеством в Арктике. Перспективными для сотрудничества являются сферы сельского хозяйства, науки, транспорта, логистики, энергетики. Автором рассматриваются взаимные выгоды Индии и России, возможности взаимодополнения потенциалов стран для развития человеческого и экономического капитала арктического региона. Особое внимание автор уделяет ранее не свойственным аспектам сотрудничества России и Индии, а именно - интересу Индии к научным исследованиям традиционных знаний, образа жизни и этнополитики в отношении коренного населения Арктики.
Об авторе
В. Сухаг
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации
Россия
Россия
Викрам СУХАГ, аспирант
Москва
Список литературы
1. Alba-Juez L. (2009). Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2. Alexiades M.N. (2009). The Cultural and Economic Globalisation of Traditional Environmental Knowledge Systems. In S. Heckler (Ed.), Landscape, Process and Power: Re-evaluating Traditional Environmental Knowledge. New York: Berghahn Books.
3. Asseng S., Ewert F., Martre P., Rötter R.P., Lobell D.B., Cammarano D., et al. (2015). Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Change 5:143. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2470.
4. Baviskar A. (2000). Claims to Knowledge, Claims to Control: Environmental Conflict in the Great Himalayan National Park, India. In R. Ellen, P. Parkes & A. Bicker (Eds.), Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 101- 119). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
5. Brosius J.P. (2000). Endangered Forest, Endangered People: Environmentalist Representations of Indigenous Knolwedge. In R. Ellen, P. Parkes & A. Bicker (Eds.) Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 293-317). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
6. Cassidy E. S., West P. C., Gerber J. S. and Foley J. A. (2013). Redefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare. Environ. Res. Lett. 8:034015. DOI: 10.1088/1748- 9326/8/3/034015.
7. Ellen R. & Harris, H. (2000). Introduction. In R. Ellen, P. Parkes & A. Bicker (Eds.), Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 1-33). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
8. Fairclough N. (1989). Language and power. Harlow: Longman.
9. Fairclough N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
10. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
11. Foucault M., & Gordon C. (1980). Power/knowledge : selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Prentice Hall.
12. Freshwater D. (2017). Growth Beyond Cities: Place-Based Rural Development Policy in Ontario. Rural Ontario Institute.
13. Government of India (2022). India’s Arctic Policy: Building a partnership for Sustainable Development.
14. Hohle E.E., Lyssandtræ F., Orlund K., Næss Killingland R. K., Mortensen P., Kvam R.S. et al. (2016). Agriculture and Climate Change. Working Group Report (Landbruk og klimaendringer. Rapport fra arbeidsgruppe). Ministry of Agriculture and Food (Landbruks- og matdepartementet).
15. IEA, Natural gas demand by sector in India in the Stated Policies Scenario, 2000-2040, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/natural-gas-demand-by-sector-in-india-in-the-stated-policies-scenario-2000- 2040 (accessed 22.05.2022).
16. Kalland A. (2000). Indigenous Knowledge: Prospects and Limitations. In R. Ellen,
17. P. Parkes & A. Bicker (Eds.), Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 319-335). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
18. Karaganov S.A., Likhacheva A.B., Stepanov I.A., Suslov D.V.et al. (2021) Russian Policy in the Arctic: International Aspects : rep. at XXII Apr. Intern. Acad. Conf. on Economic and Social Development, Moscow, April 13– 30, 2021. Nat. Res. Univ. Higher School of Economics. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. House.
19. King M., Altdorff D., Li P., Galagedara, L., Holden J., and Unc A. (2018). Northward shift of the agricultural climate zone under 21st-century global climate change. Sci. Rep. 8:7904. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018- 26321-8
20. Kupriyanov A., Korolev A. (2019) Russia and India as the Third Force in a New World Order, Valdai Club Report; Moscow.
21. Mahika Sri Krishna (2019). The Vladivostok-Chennai Maritime Corridor: The implications for China, Institute for Security & Development Policy.
22. Menzies C.R., & Butler C. (2006). Introduction: Understanding Ecological Knowledge. In C.R. Menzies (Ed.), Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Natural Resource Management (pp. 1-17). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
23. Niti A. (2018) Composite Water Management Index: Report on Water Crisis.
24. Nuttall M. (1998). Protecting the Arctic: Indigenous Peoples and Cultural Survival. Oxon: Routledge.
25. Posey D. (2000). Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology in the Context of National Laws and International Agreements Affecting Indigenous and Local Knowledge, Traditional Resources and Intellectural Property Rights. In R. Ellen, P. Parkes & A. Bicker (Eds.), Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 35-54). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
26. Rouse J. (1987). Knowledge and power: toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
27. Suhag V. (2022) Prospects of an India-Russia cooperation for Northern Agriculture. Российская Арктика. № 16. DOI:10.24412/2658-4255- 2022-0-0-00.
28. Wiréhn, L. (2018). Nordic agriculture under climate change: a systematic review of challenges, opportunities and adaptation strategies for crop production. Land Use Policy, 77, P. 63–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.059.
29. Yang X., Lin E., Ma S., Ju H., Guo L., Xiong W. et al. (2007). Adaptation of agriculture to warming in Northeast China. Clim. Change 84, 45–58. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9265-0.
30. Zakharov A. (2017) “Exploring New Drivers in India-Russia Cooperation”. Occasional Paper. No. 124., Observer Research Foundation (ORF).
31. Zent S. (2009). A Genealogy of Scientific Representations of Indigenous Knowledge. In S. Heckler (Ed.), Landscape, Process and Power: Re- evaluating Traditional Environmental Knowledge. New York: Berghahn Books.
32. (1996) Ottawa Declaration. Arctic Council. URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/85 (accessed 22.05.2022).
33. (2002) Inari Declaration. Arctic Council. URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/88 (accessed 22.05.2022).
34. (2009) Tromso Declaration. Arctic Council. URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/780/restricted-resource?bitstreamId=d7c2a211-38b9-4583-8672-b967355c0398 (accessed 22.05.2022).
35. (2017) Gazprom Neft signs memorandum of understanding with India's ONGC Videsh Ltd. on possibility of joint implementation of offshore projects. Gazprom Neft.
36. (2017) Singh, Suresh and Sharma, Manila, INSTC: India-Russia’s Trade to Get a Major Boost. Indian Engineering Exports.
37. (2018) Annual Bilateral Summit (India-Russia), Joint Statement: An enduring Partnership in a Changing World.
38. (2019) Annual Bilateral Summit (India-Russia), Joint Statement: Reaching new heights of cooperation through trust and partnership.
39. (2021) Annual Bilateral Summit (India-Russia), Joint Statement: Partnership for Peace, Progress and Prosperity.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Сухаг В. Интересы Индии в российской Арктике. Россия: общество, политика, история. 2022;(2(2)):117-132.
For citation:
Suhag V. Interests of India in the Russian Arctic Region. Russia: Society, Politics, History. 2022;(2(2)):117-132. (In Russ.)
Просмотров: 164
Послать статью по эл. почте 