Social Conditions of Russian Federation New Federal Subjects Residents in Special Military Operation Conditions

The article examines the social conditions in the territories of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, as well as the Zaporozhie and Kherson oblasts, in the context of the Special Military Operation (SMO) and the process of integration into the Russian Federation. The focus is on the transformation of public consciousness and the collective unconscious of the residents in these regions. The author relies on field research, political rhetoric analysis of regional leaders, and secondary analysis of similar studies by other researchers. The complex conditions of social and political transition are highlighted, along with the risks of emerging societal states such as borderline social reality, fragmented identity, and dependent subjectivity. The images and archetypes forming in Russia’s liberated territories are analyzed, with particular attention to the blurring boundary between war and everyday life phenomenon, which contributes to anxiety condition among the population. Archetypal structures - such as the image of the hero-defender, the suffering homeland, the motherland, and civilizational unity with Russia—play a crucial role in collective adaptation and regional subjectivity. It is stated that while all four regions share a set of common, foundational experiences and archetypes, they differ in the depth of their entrenchment and the ways how these archetypes are actualized. The conclusion is drawn on the necessity for cultural, educational, and psychological efforts that would be aimed at integrating the population and overcoming condition of traumatic uncertainty.

1. Andreev, A.L., Andreev, I.A., Slobodenyuk, E.D. (2024), Differentiation and Consolidation in Russian Society in the Context of the Special Military Operation. Polis. Political Studies, No. 1, pp. 104–119. (In Russian)

2. Bredikhin, A.V., Belokonev, S.Y. (2023), Prospects for the integration of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics into the Cultural Space of the Russian Federation. Culture: management, economy, law. No. 2. pp. 2–5. (In Russian)

3. Brodovskaya, E.V., Dombrovskaya, A.Y. (2023), Value Orientations and Political Attitudes of Residents in the LPR and DPR: Results of a 2023 Sociological Study. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences. V. 18. No. 6. pp. 88–102. (In Russian)

4. Vereshchagina, A.V. (2023), Crimean residents’ ideas about integration processes in Russian society (based on focus groups). Humanitarian of the South of Russia. No. 12. pp. 159–172. (In Russian)

5. Vnukova, L.B. (2018), Political and Socio-Economic Challenges in the Context of Public Sentiments and Identity in Donbas: Based on Expert Survey Materials. Southern Russian Journal of Social Sciences. No. 4. pp. 180–196.

6. Dombrovskaya, A.Y. (2023), Digital Communication Technologies for Integrating Residents of the LPR and DPR into the Sociocultural Space of Modern Russia. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences. V. 18. No. 2. pp. 15–28. (In Russian)

7. Ignatyeva, M.V. (2019), The Impact of Armed Conflicts on International Treaties in the Context of Overcoming Social Trauma. In: Judicial Legal Policy in Russia and Foreign Countries: A Collective Monograph. St. Petersburg: Center for Scientific and Information Technologies “Asterion”. pp. 556–560. (In Russian)

8. Komleva, V.V. (2024), Civil Identity of the Population of the New Subjects of the Russian Federation: Problems, Politics, Technologies. Russia: Society, Politics, History. No. 4(13). pp. 130–147. (In Russian)

9. Nagaichuk, A.F. (2021), Socio-Political Technologies of War and Armed Conflict: Historical and Contemporary Aspects. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies. V. 37. Issue 2. pp. 281–295. (In Russian)

10. Nestik, T.A. (2023), The Impact of Military Conflicts on the Psychological State of Society: Prospective Research Directions. Social Psychology and Society. No. 14(4). pp. 5–22. (In Russian)

11. Pyzin, V.A. (2025), New Citizens of Russia: On the Issue of Forming the Mental Attitudes towards Integration into the Russian Federation of the Population of the Liberated Territories. Russia: Society, Politics, History. No. 2(15). pp. 162–175. (In Russian)

12. Semenishcheva, L.A. (2024), Social Protection of Combat Veterans in the Russian Federation: Analysis and Prospects. Bulletin of Science. No. 11 (80). pp. 462–473. (In Russian)

13. Tikhonova, N.E., Dudin, I.V. (2024), Identities of Russians as a Factor in the Consolidation of Russian Society. Sociological Research. No. 11. pp. 18–33. (In Russian)

14. Shestopal, E.A., Selezneva, O.V. (2022), Stages of Transformation of the Psychological State of Russian Society: A Political-Psychological Analysis. Psychological Expertise: POLITEX. V. 19. No. 2. pp. 150– 165. (In Russian)

15. Shmatko, A.A. (2022), Historical Consciousness as a Factor in the Demythologization and Detraumatization of Public Consciousness. Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philosophy. Political Science. Cultural Studies. No. 3. pp. 25–32. (In Russian)

16. Yakovenko, A.V. (2015), Problems of Ukraine’s Foreign Policy Self-Determination. Sociological Research. No. 8. pp. 128–133. (In Russian)

17. Alexander, J.C. (2012), Trauma: A Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press. 234 p.

18. Bar-Tal, D. (2013), Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge University Press. 452 p.

19. Pfefferbaum, B., North, C.S., Flynn, B.W. (2017), Post-traumatic stress in displaced Ukrainians. Journal of Traumatic Stress. Vol. 30(3). pp. 242–249.

20. Smelser, N.J. (2004), Psychological Trauma and Cultural Trauma. In: Alexander J.C. et al. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 31–59.

21. Younger, K. (2022), Memory and Trauma in Post-Euromaidan Ukraine. Vienna: Institute for Human Sciences (IWM).