Laws of Dialectics and the Implementation of Power Relations
https://doi.org/10.56654/ROPI-2024-3(12)-113-126
Abstract
Social relations are characterized by the movement of interests and needs of different groups and strata of society, which often come into contradictions. These contradictions are of a dialectical nature, and it is the responsibility of the government to articulate these interests. The purpose of this article is to identify the main contradictions that underlie the three stages of political power relations. To do this, the author relies on the dialectical method, which is used as one of methods of creative thinking in observation and contradictions resolvement. Using the laws of materialistic dialectics, the author observes the key factors through the political and philosophical point of view that should be considered in political and administrative activity.
About the Author
I. A. Khusnatdinov
Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ildar A Khusnatdinov, Master’s degree student
Moscow
References
1. Aleksandrov, G.F. (1954), Dialectical materialism. Moscow: Institut filosofii AN SSSR. (In Russian)
2. Antanovich, N.A. (2007), Political and administrative relations in the process of public administration. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v XXI veke: tradicii i innovacii. No. 5. pp. 822-826. (In Russian)
3. Aristotle (2016), Politics. Moscow: AST. (In Russian)
4. Bessonov, B.N. (2010), History of Philosophy and Science. Moscow: Urait. (In Russian)
5. Borisenkov, A.A. (2021), Political leadership: expectations and trends. Izdatel’skij dom «Nauchnaya biblioteka». No. 4. pp. 120-136. (In Russian)
6. Hegel, G.V.F. (2006), Lectures on the history of philosophy. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian)
7. Kashchaev, A.E. (2012), Methodology of social conflict analysis. Baikal Research Journal. No. 5. pp. 36-41. (In Russian)
8. Komarovsky, V.S. (2019), Political and administrative management: a textbook for undergraduate and graduate studies. Moscow: Urait. (In Russian)
9. Machiavelli, N. (1996), The Prince. Moscow: Matrin. (In Russian)
10. Malinin S.A. (2014), Power and the State in the philosophy of Hegel. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. No. 10. pp. 234-239. (In Russian)
11. Mahamatov, T.M. (2018), The dialectic of the ontological factors of politics. Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University. No. 3 (33). pp. 28-35. (In Russian)
12. Orlova, I.V. (2023), Mechanisms for domestic policy formation in the context of dialectics of political leadership. Vlast. Vol. 31. No. 6. pp. 37-49. (In Russian)
13. Pyzin, V.A. (2020), Domestic policy: meanings, structures, functions. Izdatel’skij dom «Nauchnaya biblioteka». No. 3. pp. 8-25. (In Russian)
14. Pyzin, V.A. (2021), Political leadership: the essence, content and practice-oriented models of analysis. Izdatel’skij dom «Nauchnaya biblioteka». No 4. pp. 6-25. (In Russian)
15. Tetior, A.N. (2017), Simplified laws of G. Hegel’s dialectics. Sciences of Europe. No. 16. pp. 73-81. (In Russian)
16. Shabrov, O.F. (2004), Political and Administrative Management in the Russian Federation: current state and current problems. Vlast. No. 11. pp. 9-17. (In Russian)
17. Sheptulin, A.P. (1966), The basic laws of dialectics. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian)
18. Shibakova, E.A. (2011), The dialectical method of cognition in philosophy. Intellektual’nyj potencial XXI veka: stupeni poznaniya. No. 5-2. pp. 114-117. (In Russian)
19. Spengler, O. (1998), The Decline of the West. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian)
20. Engels, F. (1961), Sochineniya. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoj literatury. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Khusnatdinov I.A. Laws of Dialectics and the Implementation of Power Relations. Russia: Society, Politics, History. 2024;(3(12)):113-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.56654/ROPI-2024-3(12)-113-126
Views:
208
Email this article 